The mood by those in power was that gov't. was only as good as it was not, and it's only legitimate function was defense of the people.
2010-03-06
Toyota Owners Report Problems in Japan to No Avail - NYTimes.com
The article below, on Japan's (the gov't's, esp.) take on consumer safety, with the Toyota acceleration issue being the lens, reminds me of a conversation I had with some Germans several years ago in California. "What about food safety?," one asked. "Surely the government ensures that what we eat is safe!" "Uhm, no," I told her. "Actually, as far as I know, in the US, it's caveat emptor. If problems become evident, then the government may act. But with the exception of drugs dispensed under the procedures governing prescriptions, it's pretty much a purely voluntary effort on the part of the maker and distributor. And an obligation of the buyer to be aware." She was skeptical, and I may have been wrong in some details, like what is governed and subject to scrutiny; what is the responsibility of government. But this was during the Bush II years (dark times) and laissez faire in all things, along with the programmatic defunding and de-legitimization of government was at its peak.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment